Astroturf?

Mar. 13th, 2007 07:20 pm
liadnan: (Default)

Intrigued enough by the adverts for http://www.information-revolution.org/ on the tube over the last couple of days that I finally found time to look at the site. It's all a little vague and gnomic but it seems reasonably clear the Bee in their Bonnet is Google.

Which is why it's interesting to note, as several people in the comments here did, that the site is owned by Profero Ltd (as a quick whois confirms), a "digital marketing" outfit whose clients include Yahoo! and Ask. Can't trust anything these days. The revolution will be televised, and probably sponsored.

liadnan: (Default)

Prompted by Oursin I have just been poking around the Downing Street Petitions site. I finally broke at this one. Although I could have been convinced to sign up for this one.

The British Library one, which sparked Oursin's original visit, I happily signed, incidentally.

liadnan: (Default)

Obnoxious and ignorant woman famous solely for being obnoxious and ignorant on reality tv show is obnoxious and ignorant on reality tv show. This sentence really ought to be followed by "film at 11", not by "international furore and mild diplomatic spat follows", surely. What did anyone expect?

liadnan: (Default)

Your daily terror threat analysis. I for one will be signing up. It can go into the "random" folder, along with Snowmail, B3TA, and Popbitch. Another step more ludicrous every day...

I was promised flying cars, not a daily terror-level email.

I was tempted to add something crude about the expression on Dame Elizabeth Manningham-Butler's face in the photograph, but we are all grown-up and above such things. Aren't we?

Splendid

Dec. 13th, 2006 06:23 pm
liadnan: (Default)

Someone has created an anonymous journal to preserve for posterity yesterday's bizarre account of "My Tornado Hell" in the London Evening Standard. It takes rare genius to cause me to lose sympathy for someone who has, after all, seen their home destroyed, but she almost manages it... Every sentence a gem, though the narrow frontrunner is probably:

"He said we could stay in a hotel. Adrian explained that there is only one hotel in London: Claridge's. Simon did not demur. And he loved what's left of our specialist-polished plaster walls".

liadnan: (Default)

Various people have picked up on the story of the 82 year old thrown out of the Labour Party conference for heckling Jack Straw (seems you were lucky Ritu in doing it in an environment he didn't control...). Which was in itself a fucking disgrace (and the story of Austin Mitchell having his photographs deleted by the police isn't too impressive either.)

But the point I find scariest about the first story is the second paragraph:

"Police later used powers under the Terrorism Act to prevent Mr Wolfgang's re-entry"

I'm sorry, Terrorism Act powers? Against an 84 year old heckler? Please tell me this is a mistake in the report. But the long-running story of the ban on demonstrating in Parliament Square (fundamentally flawed and an utter failure in that it was aimed solely at one person and is unusable against him) makes me suspect not.

Profile

liadnan: (Default)
liadnan

February 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 03:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios