Astroturf?
Mar. 13th, 2007 07:20 pmIntrigued enough by the adverts for http://www.information-revolution.org/ on the tube over the last couple of days that I finally found time to look at the site. It's all a little vague and gnomic but it seems reasonably clear the Bee in their Bonnet is Google.
Which is why it's interesting to note, as several people in the comments here did, that the site is owned by Profero Ltd (as a quick whois confirms), a "digital marketing" outfit whose clients include Yahoo! and Ask. Can't trust anything these days. The revolution will be televised, and probably sponsored.
Astroturf.
Date: 2007-03-13 07:46 pm (UTC)I always want to just avoid talking about this stuff, 'cos I feel that talking about it is what they want.
Hmm, guess that isn't working.
Re: Astroturf.
Date: 2007-03-14 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:33 am (UTC)Saving your presence, there does seem a bit of an argument that google are just a tad too ubiquitous. Having been burnt by MS does the world really need to get locked in to something again? But the answer seems to me to be that there is no technological lockin and, at least for the moment, as soon as google ceases to be the best search engine out there they will lose their dominance. All the other bits and pieces they have, gmail & co, useful as many of us find much of it, is just an add-on. From the outside it seems that much of the "other stuff" is aimed at breaking an MS/Yahoo/whatever monopoly (or preventing one from coming into existence) rather than creating a googlopoly.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 03:36 pm (UTC)For which the top result is...