![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Though the Court of Appeal have now held that despite the appallingly shoddy drafting of the legislation preventing unauthorised protests in Parliament Square, the section does indeed apply to Brian Haw, for the moment he remains (unless things have developed further since last night's raid).
The response from the Police and Government seems pretty ridiculously pathetic - see here for last night's antics.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 05:34 pm (UTC)The legitimacy of the government derives solely from the fact that a majority of those individuals nonetheless would continue to support the government in the event of a vote of no confidence.
This may seem a pedantic point but I'm finding references to Tony Blair winning a general election increasingly irritating. He did no such thing, and personally I believe quite a lot of votes went to people from his party in spite of, rather than because of, him.
As for your previous point: if we're to be reduced to cheering because we're only repressing the right to free speech and free assembly with ordinary police force, not with totalitarian methods and paramilitary police, then we're in trouble.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 10:25 am (UTC)And yes, I was being facetious, but if we throw around charges about the death of democracy and the loss of our government's legitimacy because a clapper disapears from a handbell, how will we define the difference between that and genuine totalitarianism? Outrage is cheap, but I still get annoyed when I see it piled higher than the circumstances warrant.