I Think Umberto Eco Should Sue
Apr. 7th, 2006 03:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Judgment for defendants in Baigent & Leigh v. Random House Ltd (as Dan Brown's publishers and, in fact, their own)
(There's a summary version on the HM Court Service website.)
There is no "Architecture" or "Structure" to be found in HBHG or the Central Themes as contended by the Claimants nor has Dan Brown infringed any such Architecture or Structure or substantially copied HBHG when he wrote DVC although it is clear it was used to write the Langdon/Teabing lectures.
Not my legal field so I pass no comment, save that historically and artistically both books are rubbish. Peter Smith seems to have been quite enthused, more than he has been when I've been before him anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 02:49 pm (UTC)But you're right - DVC is total crap.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 03:46 pm (UTC)Much of my time in the bookshop was spent rearranging Dan Brown books and related nonsense (often in the
mumbo-jumboMind, Body and Spirit section), so I've built a healthy distaste for the man and his work.no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 03:51 pm (UTC)Sorry I didn't manage to get in touch with you yesterday by the way, was a bit busy all day. Hope to see you again soon.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 09:47 pm (UTC)