(no subject)
Jan. 5th, 2004 04:58 pmVia Katy: Oh dear.
Katy is a kind soul and passed on the link without judging. I, however, am bitter, twisted, and a bit of a git, and have no such compunction. They're all mad I tell you, utterly mad. In particular:
"1. These people believe in reincarnation.
2. Specifically, they believe that they are the reincarnated spirits of characters from Japanese cartoons and video games."
The internet is a Big Mistake and Must be Stopped.
I may actually make a proper post at some point, alternatively I may just go home and drink, in order to avoid worrying about how I'm going to pay that nice Mr Brown. Time will tell.
(Edited to paste the right link from the clipboard. Duh.)
Katy is a kind soul and passed on the link without judging. I, however, am bitter, twisted, and a bit of a git, and have no such compunction. They're all mad I tell you, utterly mad. In particular:
"1. These people believe in reincarnation.
2. Specifically, they believe that they are the reincarnated spirits of characters from Japanese cartoons and video games."
The internet is a Big Mistake and Must be Stopped.
I may actually make a proper post at some point, alternatively I may just go home and drink, in order to avoid worrying about how I'm going to pay that nice Mr Brown. Time will tell.
(Edited to paste the right link from the clipboard. Duh.)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:13 am (UTC)(I remember when "Emo" was simply a really depressed and depressing comic that we watched on my friend's cable tv in the middle of the night in, oh, 5th grade?)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:17 am (UTC)(and imagine, if you will, what a comforable life it must be, to be mad in just that sort of way. i'm kinda jealous.)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:22 am (UTC)To give them some credit, the splendid diatribe from 665 to which I linked is itself now cited with a kind of approval on http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=otakukin.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:36 am (UTC)Really, I missed most of that, being more of the gothy-newage-oldcountry-jazz type myself...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 10:58 am (UTC)oh dear!
Date: 2004-01-05 12:23 pm (UTC)LOL
(I'm sorry - I was thinking that I had problems with my muses, but this is amazing! )
Thank you! This is an excellent link!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 02:58 pm (UTC)Re: oh dear!
Date: 2004-01-06 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:20 am (UTC)I agree with the point you make about religion and sanity in general. Though one is heading for the dangerous area of what "insanity" is (ask Dr_D I guess). Then there's the philosophical question of whether one can talk about an objective "reality" in any case, though I am personally convinced one can.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:26 am (UTC)Yes, I see the distinction. I think my attitude to it is a bit like Pratchett's attitude to gods - that they take on a sort of reality if people believe in them fervently enough.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 06:41 am (UTC)